How many Americans do you think have heard about this story? We are 5 days away from the general election and incredibly we do not know if Barack Obama is eligible to run for the office of President of the United States.

Today Philadelphia attorney Phillip Berg, a Democrat and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania is heading to the Supreme Court, in hopes that a decision will be handed down forcing the DNC and Barack Obama to produce the vault birth certificate that finally proves once and for all, whether or not Barry Sotero, aka Barry Dunham, aka Barack Hussein Obama is natural born citizen and whether he was ever eligible to run for office of any kind.

The silence of the MSM on this blockbuster story, a story with profound issues that go directly to the heart of the Constitution remains stubbornly under reported, unless a person happened to catch this story on the Toledo TV station.

When history traces back to the “death of journalism” this will be one of the stories that will be brought up, dissected, and marveled at, along with stories like the Obama “Truth Squads” in Missouri. For by not reporting the legion of legitimate Obama stories, the MSM has gelded itself, rendered the Fourth Estate impotent. What is worse, is that these unreported Obama stories are potent lies of omission . . . the very worst kind of lies . . . because these types of lies require forethought!

Even if one thought the Berg v Obama case was frivolous, that Berg was a whack job, this story is at least as important as the one about Hillary’s Pennsylvania campaign spending $30,000.00 on Dunkin Donuts. (she said facetiously, should anyone miss the sarcasm) But this isn’t about donuts, this is about democracy. This is about Howard Dean, the DNC, and Obama knowingly foisting an ineligible candidate on America . . . a candidate, BTW, some have likened to the Manchurian Candidate. This is about the 18 million Hillary voters whose rights have already been abridged.

sidebar: Mr. Berg why aren’t you suing on behalf and Jane & John Doe and the already disenfranchised 18 million voters who would be voting for their candidate of choice, Hillary Rodham Clinton, instead of the impostor Obama? Doesn’t that give us standing? This injury has already come to pass. Seems to me that Judge Posen’s quote in the ruling just handed down by presiding judge in round one of Berg v. Obama fits us to a tee. Judge Posen said in part:

[…] Desire does not create standing . . . It must be more direct and immediate. It must (at least) resemble the type of injury that would support a lawsuit under traditional principles of common law or equity; it must therefor affect one’s possessions, or bodily integrity, or freedom of action (emphasis mine.)

It must, in short, be fairly describable as an injury personal to the plaintiff – a deprivation of his rights.

To which I would argue . . . HELLO . . . haven’t I already been deprived of my right to vote for HRC, a candidate we know meets the Constitutional requirements to run for office of POTUS?

According to Edwin Vieira, Jr., in OBAMA MUST STAND UP NOW OR STAND DOWN, if it turns out Obama was ineligible from the onset of the election, he faces some very serious consequences, and it seems to me, so too those who assisted in perpetrating this fraud. He says, in part:

[…] Obama’s stubborn refusal to provide what he claims is “his own” country with conclusive proof (emphasis is mine) on that score compels the presumption that he knows, or at least strongly suspects, that no sufficient evidence in his favor exists. After all, he is not being pressed to solve a problem in quantum physics that is “above his pay grade,” but only asked to provide the public with the original copy of some official record that establishes his citizenship.


[…] Second, if Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for “the Office of President, he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,”

[…] Third, his purported “Oath or Affirmation” being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242,

[…] Eight, … if the Establishment allowed Obama to pretend to be “the President,” and the people acquiesced in that charade, just about everything that was done during his faux “tenure in office” by anyone connected with the Executive Branch of the General Government, and quite a bit done by the Legislative Branch and perhaps the Judicial Branch as well, would be arguably illegitimate and subject to being overturned when a constitutional President was finally installed in office. The potential for chaos, both domestically and internationally, arising out of this systemic uncertainty is breathtaking.

Now, at the risk of being accused of wearing tin foil on my head, so be it!

Anyone remember Biden’s warning that in 6 months there would be a crisis facing the country and many people would not support Obama’s actions even though the new Administration felt they were right? What’s to prevent a faux President Obama from declaring martial law? Thanks to Bush 43’s signing NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51, a faux President Obama could do this at will, in the name of national security!

In another barely reported story, powerful generals from the most powerful nations in the world recently held a meeting in tiny town in upstate New York. The Army has also stationed an infantry unit inside the United States. It is the first time a dedicated unit has been given an assignment as a response force for “crowd control” and other sorts of internal tasks.

Tell me again why the MSM isn’t reporting on Obama’s refusal to produce his vault birth certificate, his college transcripts, his health records . . . all the basic documentation required of any candidate for the office of president.

While you’re at, tell me if I should be adjusting the tin foil on my head or going out to arm up should there be an insurrection?

For excellent on going legal analysis Berg v. Obama see:America’s Right.


Leave a comment

Filed under 2008 Election, Barack Obama, cable networks, Congress, Democratic National Committee, Hillary Clinton, political party, politics, RANDOM, Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s