DONOFRIO v. WELLS – THE ONGOING CENSORSHIP ATTACKS

What is it that they have to fear?

Who am I referring to when I say “they”? I’m talking about the Obama’s thugs that hacked into Leo Donforio’s original site at at blogtext.org 5 days ago. His blog, Natural Born CItizen, went down as Leo was discussing his case Donofrio v Wells on Plains Radio. This case is scheduled for a closed conference between the Justices of the Supreme Court on December 5th. At that time, should the Justices agree, full arguments will begin in front of the court that will determine if Barack Hussein Obama was ever eligible to run for the office of POTUS.

In Leo’s own words:

Yesterday, Nov. 21 2008, my previous blog – blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen – was taken down as was the entire blogtext.org network.

I have relocated here to Blogger.com. Mirror sites containing the exact content have been (or will be shortly) set up. Everybody is hereby authorized to mirror the contents of this blog.

Today I visited the new site at http://thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com and read a cautionary message that said in effect “enter at your own risk.” Why would this be necessary . . . it’s just a blog, right? Right! I am directing people to Leo’s newest site so they can view the court documents, and an array of posts, videos, etc. that pertain to this case.

Let me make a couple of quick points:

  1. People censor that which they fear . . . in this case, the truth about Obama’s eligibility.
  2. There are numerous mirror sites that will continue to contain the information about Donofrio v. Wells, even if Leo’s newest site, goes down again.
  3. To those who keep messing with the site, videos, etc. Every incursion and attempt to stop discussion and information dissemination is further proof that Leo and a host of others who have lawsuits pending are on the right track.

Here’s another video asking for Obama to produce his birth certificate. The Donofrio suit is not anchored to the birth certificate issue, but to Barack’s dual citizenship at birth. The question remains . . . why not just produce the documents?


Advertisements

18 Comments

Filed under 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Culture, Democrats, LEGAL ISSUES, political party, politics, RANDOM, Uncategorized

18 responses to “DONOFRIO v. WELLS – THE ONGOING CENSORSHIP ATTACKS

  1. ahrcanum

    Who censored it and and if someone or some organization shut it down then what else are “they” capable of?” Maybe the equal comments act? aka Fairness Doctrine?

  2. I also got that cautionary message that said in effect “enter at your own risk” when I went to http://thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com.

    Just wondering if we can all carry the info on all our sites, that way if they block Leo, then we’d have all our ours on record for the public to see.

    I just want to say to Sean Hannity, O’Reily, Hugh Hewitt, Prager, Medved, Laura Ingram, and another other folks who have access to the public that you are doing a terrible disservice to the American public by not broadcasting this in a serious and continuous manner. It shows your ignorance to the merits of the cases brought forward, or it’s a sign of a dangerous partisanship.
    Either way, you have ceased to be informative to the American public.

    Get crakin’ folks.

  3. I made a screen shot of the “warning”. It was posted by Blogger as a warning to Leo Donofrio and potential visitors. I have felt all along that Leo should steer clear of Blogger/Google because of their history of interfering with anti-Obama sites. The “warning”:

  4. sv colbert

    Traditional values coalition has agreed to have their attorneys review Donofrio v Wells, so this organization can fill the void of news organizations and actively inform their huge email list.

    Send a request to mail@traditionalvalues.org to receive updates, which should start after Thanksgiving weekend. Let them know you are signing up to get SCOTUS case info.

    Donofrio claims Hillary would be eligible to receive all the electoral votes that would have gone to Obama. Before an inauguration, Biden would not qualify to take Obama’s place, since he did not run for president. Hillary qualifies, because she was a POTUS candidate, and electors must choose a Democrat, as Dems got the most electoral votes.

  5. Ted

    Best explanation (following 2 you tube videos) I’ve seen for the total media blackout of what is the single greatest news event and domestic threat — let’s call it OBAMAGATE — since the outbreak of the American Civil War and for the sincere prayers of the American people that the United States Supreme Court — let’s call it OUR LAST HOPE — now to have the courage to save our great nation as we have come to know it:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1spPrzvYWRI

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8b_usFyLHQ

  6. Citizen Cane

    WOW, Donofrio is good at what he does!!!

  7. Citizen Cane

    Sportsone, do you know who wrote that:
    ___________

    Nickname: Jet Schizo

    Started Playing (Date): Stud as a kid, but Hold Em in 2002 while in Vegas for a big chess tournament just before new years.

    Long Term Poker Goals: To be the best the tournament hold em player the world has ever seen.

    Poker players that Leo most respects: All pros who can make a living doing this.

    Other key points of interest:: I’m the ringleader of an esotericf critically acclaimed sonic indie rock band with electro splashes and bossa nova dreams called SCHIZO FUN ADDICT.
    ___________

    SCHIZO FUN ADDICT? BWHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHA!!!

    You guys are just killing me!

  8. Citizen Cane

    Leo Donofrio & Lan Lamphere on Overnight AM – What happened and Why:

    http://www.lanlamphere.com/public/2008/11/25/leo-donofrio-lan-lamphere-on-overnight-am-what-happened-and-why/
    _______________

    Quote: “We believe that this issue is highly suspect. That Leo Donofrio, a failed ex-attorney turned professional gambler, comes out of no where to the aid of the American People with information, and legal references that force the issue of the Supreme Court’s attention to the subject. Determining a legal definition of the phrase ‘natural born Citizen’ just when the newly elected President of the United States needs it the most to clear his name, and history is suspect.”
    _______________

  9. Citizen Cane

    Philip Berg: “There’s a mob in the White House”
    _______________

    Former Pennsylvania deputy Attorney General Philip Berg represents a group of families of the victims of the 9/11, 2001 attacks in the US – people who “did not accept the ‘hush money’” and denounced, instead, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the White House for their accountability in the terrorist actions.

    (snip)

    There’s a mob in the White House!” Philip Berg repeated from the platform at the Axis for Peace International Conference organized by the Voltaire Network on November 17-18, 2005 in Brussels. “Bush should be jailed for slaughter and high treason” – he concluded.
    _____________

    http://www.voltairenet.org/article131472.html

  10. sportsone234

    Cane:

    I’m not sure why, but of late WP has been putting selected comments on hold for me to approve . . . don’t know why, but they have. That having been said, let me tell you why I approved your remarks.

    I will not censor you because you hold an opinion that is opposed to mine, unlike a WP site I recently visited. That’s hideous in a democracy. Heard the latest . . . Google sandboxing Atlas Shrugs! The owner is a pal of Obama’s. Guess we’ve got ourselves a new Minister of Propaganda.

    I asked Jonathan Turley to comment on Obama’s problems with Article II Section 1 since he had written a post on McCain’s problems eligibility problems as a “natural born citizen” . . . after all how can one comment on one candidate and completely omit the other? How indeed, if one is being intellectually honest? The answer is obvious, isn’t it?

    Notice, I didn’t ask him to agree or disagree . . . just comment! That was 5 days ago, and I’m still waiting.

    Now as to your comments. Rather than trying to bring down the credibility of the messengers (yes, I know Berg and the 9/11 issues and yes, Donofrio is a poker player) focus on the credibility of the comments and the issues they have brought to light!

    You are amusing and seem to be a decent fellow . . . stay focused, please. My guess is that you are better than some of the trivia you leave here.

  11. Citizen Cane

    Sportsone, I appreciate your blog, because it is open to different opinion. I prefer controversies to be discussed openly, from various aspects, but in a civic manner. I can’t learn anything for those who totally agree with me.

    If Google is indeed limiting a freedom of speech to anyone – regardless if I agree with that person or not – I’m firmly oppose to that. About Atlas Shrugs: I just tried to google for – Obama’s online birth certificate a “forgery” – and Atlas Shrugs was the first hit??? Try it for yourself.

    Now, about Berg and Donfrio: you need to have a rock firm credibility if you want to seriously confront the president-elect’s credibility. Andy Martin has a similar problem (Anti-Semitism); but that again google or yahoo after his opinion about Berg – under “The strange behavior of Philadelphia lawyer Philip J. Berg«

    Haven’t you asked yourself why the hell haven’t Republican legal experts exposed that issue when that would made sense?

    What if both COLB and “Natural Born Citizen” issues are just baits to distract public from a real issue?

    Hint: “follow the money”

  12. Citizen Cane

    Besides, I stated my arguments against Donofrio’s claim before in this blog. Let’s do it again

    Obama is a natural-born citizen of the United States, for the simple reason that he was born on American soil (the opposite wasn’t proved so far). The age and citizenship status of Obama’s parents at the time have no bearing on Obama’s own citizenship.

    Any confusion on this point might only be a result of misunderstanding the legal concepts of jus sanguinis (right of blood) and jus soli (right of birthplace). Here is how the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service explains the difference:

    “The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees citizenship at birth to almost all individuals born in the United States or in U.S. jurisdictions, according to the principle of jus soli. Certain individuals born in the United States, such as children of foreign heads of state or children of foreign diplomats, do not obtain U.S. citizenship under jus soli.”

    A wishfull thinking has nothing to do with a hard reality, sorry.

  13. XXX said to email any pertinent replies back from our request to the Secretaries of State in regards to our requests for Obama’s records:

    MORE INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE!!!

    Here’s 2 responses back from South Carolina and Connecticut for request for records:

    1) South Carolina: RESPONSE FROM SECRETARY OF STATE SOUTH CAROLINA: PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO PAGE 2 IN WHICH THE CHAIR OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF SOUTH CAROLINA [CAROL FOWLER] UNEQUIVOCALLY STATES THE CANDIDATES ALL QUALIFY FOR THE OFFICE IN WHICH THEY ARE RUNNING.

    2) Connecticut: RESPONSE FROM SECRETARY OF STATE OF Connecticut, IN WHICH SHE USES THE HAWAIIAN OFFICIALS PRESS CONFERENCE AS HER VETTING PROCESS OF OBAMA????!!! BIG PROBLEMS WITH THIS FOR HER. He was supposed to be vetted BEFORE he ran for office AND her statement about Hawaiian officials saying Obama was born in Hawaii and that they hold his original birth certificate is based on a PRESS CONFERENCE where Hawaii officials never said they verified he was born in Hawaii and they refused to answer if the original birth certificate they held was a Kenyan one or a Hawaiian one. AND THE PRESS CONFERENCE WAS IN NOVEMBER PER HER OWN ADMISSION – 3 MONTHS AFTER HE WAS DECLARED THE NOMINEE !!!

    1. SEC OF STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA RESPONSE, 3 PAGES
    2. SEC OF STATE OF Connecticut RESPONSE, 1 PAGE

    CLICK BELOW TO SEE 2 DOCS:
    http://moniquemonicat.wordpress.com/secretary-of-state-responses-in-regards-to-request-for-obama-records/

    p.s. “xxx” = my code for a 3-word blog name

  14. I noticed yesterday that Leo’s original site was back up; whatever the problem was at Blogtext.org has apparently been fixed.

    Citizen Cane: Check out the latest at TD Blog containing Judah Benjamin’s thesis; interesting but not necessarily hopeful from a constitutionalist standpoint.
    http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/

  15. ScottVA

    I can tell you right now that NoBama can have a certified BC and still not be a natural born US Citizen. I believe this is why he won’t just settle the dispute once and for all…..for in fact these lawsuits are correct in their content! My partner was born in Hawaii in early 60’s (as his father was in the Navy there)…. I have seen his original BC from Hawaii.
    There is a section down below around Line 7 which asks if the person was born outside of Hawaii and then a place that could include the place of birth…. I found out in those days it was possible to get a BC registered in Hawaii even if the person wasn’t born there. So, I believe that NoBama has one but it is one that would not demonstrate that he was, indeed, a natural born US citizen!

  16. Candy Cane

    @ steadyjohn: I agree, Judah Benjamin thesis are interesting – as always.

    @ MoniQue: like it or not, Chiyome Fukino, The director of Hawaii’s Department of Health made a clear statement that she has “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

    According to that policy she isn’t be allowed to verfiy a foreign BC. Obama wouldn’t have been granted for US citizenship by jus soli (right of birthplace) without being born of the American soil.

    Donofrio speculation that Obama’s isn’t a “natural born citizen” since dual citizenship at his birth makes him untrustworthy is absurd; according to that same speculation, “Framers” would be considered even less trustworthy – all of them were citizens of UK at birth. “Natural born citizen” means “citizens of the United States at birth” as defined by U.S. Code, Title 8, Section 1401.

  17. Citizen Cane

    That’s my girl!

  18. Citizen Cane

    Sportyones, about Jonathan Turley: I don’t buy bulsh!it from any side. I didn’t buy it when Berg was suing Bush for “slaughter and high treason” on 9/11 as well.

    In accordance to U.S. Code, Title 8, Section 1401

    http://law.onecle.com/uscode/8/1401.html

    The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

    (a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;

    (c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;

    Since the term “citizens of the United States at birth” undoubtedly equals to the old fashioned term “natural born citizen”, both Obama (a) and McCain (c) qualify for that criteria.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s