ABORTING OBAMA’S PRESIDENCY – STOPPING THE COUNTRY’S FINANCIAL HEMORRHAGING

bailoutObama has been in office less than 60 days and the damage he and his team have wrought on the nation’s economy verges on the criminal. The market is in free fall. Just yesterday, the DOW dropped another 300 points, reaching depths not seen for decades and the lowest in 14 years. There’s no end in sight and why should there be? Obama has done his very best to talk the economy down using fear and warning of catastrophe . . . recently 25 times in one 20 minute speech!

I find myself wanting to yell, “Can’t anyone take that damn microphone out of his hands?” Every time he opens his mouth the markets go down! Investors on Wall Street and people on Main Street have no confidence in this scatterbrain incoherent policy; and rightfully so. The Obama team’s attempts at radical transformation of this country from capitalism to socialism are being soundly rejected by millions who know that the Obama stimulus plan stinks that the bailout plans are pure insanity, fiscal suicide.

So we are faced with Obama’s ambition and the Democrats greed . . . evil twins working to end this country’s greatness while stomping on the Constitution. But do we have to endure this wholesale destruction of our economy until the next election; maybe not.

There may be a way to stop the hemorrhaging of confidence and dollars from the U.S. treasury. Obama’s presidency needs to be aborted. Let me very clear. I am not advocating anything other than a lawful removal of the Usurper and the end of this fraudulent presidency. How?

In point of fact, if we who oppose his faux presidency on Constitutional grounds are proven to have been correct from the “get go” any and all legislation passed in a phony president’s term of office would be null and void never having been legal from the onset. Let me emphasize that point yet again. The $787 trillion legislation . . . the 1,000 page bill no one in Congress read and passed would not have the force and effect of law because Obama’s presidency was never legitimate.

Quoting from Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.

Fifth, as nothing but an usurper (if he becomes one), Obama will have no conceivable authority “to make Treaties”, or to “nominate, and * * * appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not * * * otherwise provided for [in the Constitution]” (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2). And therefore any “Treaties” or “nominat[ions], and * * * appoint[ments]” he purports to “make” will be void ab initio, no matter what the Senate does, because the Senate can neither authorize an usurper to take such actions in the first place, nor thereafter ratify them. One need not be a lawyer to foresee what further, perhaps irremediable, chaos must ensue if an usurper, even with “the Advice and Consent of the Senate”, unconstitutionally “appoint[s] * * * Judges of the Supreme Court” whose votes thereafter make up the majorities that wrongly decide critical “Cases” of constitutional law. Sixth, and perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.” The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to an usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”

Sixth, and perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President. The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to an usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”

Yesterday World Net Daily reported that Obama’s eligibility is topping AOL News:

Internet giant America Online headlined its daily news coverage today with a story and polls covering the “Birthers,” a group of people it describes as “fringe conservatives convinced that Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because of supposed questions surrounding his birth status.”

Let me state for record. I am neither a conservative, or a tin foil wearing wingnut, or any other pejorative descriptor typically used to isolate anyone who opposes Obama and his poisonous policies. I don’t believe in conspiracy theories except for Kennedy’s assassination.

Thus far the MSM and pro-Obama sites would have you believe that only a small fringe element is concerned about Obama’s eligibility. Nothing could be farther from the truth. We are young, old, rich, poor, male, female, and our political positions and affiliations wide and varied. But we all agree on one thing. Obama needs to produce the records that show unequivocally that he has always been eligible to hold the office of POTUS. There is no longer any other option . . . this story is not going away.

If you hate Obama’s financial policies join us and let’s find out once and for all if he was ever eligible to hold office. If it turns out he has always been eligible, we are stuck with him for the foreseeable future. If it turns out he was never eligible, everything out of legal necessity, would be put on hold until a legitimate person was elected to hold the office.

BTW, that doesn’t mean Biden would automatically assume the office since he was chosen by an ineligible Obama. If you are a Obama supporter, join us, if for no other reason than to “shut all birthers up!”

The citizens of this country and the world deserve the truth. The time has long since passed!

Advertisements

10 Comments

Filed under 2008 Election, Barack Obama, business, Congress, Democrats, LEGAL ISSUES, political party, politics, RANDOM, Uncategorized

10 responses to “ABORTING OBAMA’S PRESIDENCY – STOPPING THE COUNTRY’S FINANCIAL HEMORRHAGING

  1. asmalltowndad

    As one who believes totally in capitalism, prayed for the election to go any direction other than Obama the Socialist. Now, I can only hope that people become better educated on governments and learn that Socialism and hand outs only tear a Nation apart instead of building strength. We are one of the youngest Countries on Earth and because of hard working citizens and Capitalism, we have become the strongest and most giving in just 200+ years.

  2. MarkOh

    You have GOT to be kidding me, right? You don’t HONESTLY believe that the collapse of the market is due to Obama? PUH-LEASE! Bush was in office for 8 years – it is HIS programs and policy that we are dealing with now.

  3. sportsone234

    MarkOh

    Oh, PUH-LEASE, I never said Obama was completely responsible for the collapse.

    No, what Obama did was to inherit a bad economy and made it worse. He and his team decided to make it worse by irresponsibly doubling/tripling the national debt by spending our way to socialism.

    I am a small business owner, one of people responsible for creating 75% of the nation’s jobs. There’s not a damn thing in the stimulus package that helps small business! . . . opps sorry, it has been reported that 1% of the Obama financial foolishness aka “stimulus plan” is for small business.

    What a joke!

  4. Al

    Hillary is ruining our foreign policy!

  5. If you’re going to worry about chicanery and switcheroos, why not worry about the fact that England is being led by a member of the Monty Python troupe?

    It’s true, really. See here:
    http://timpanogos.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/terry-jones-and-gordon-brown-one-and-the-same/

  6. Fortunateson

    Sour grapes. Your guy lost the other guy one grow up and move on

  7. sportsone234

    Fortunateson:

    Your “sour grapes” comment is silly ass and immature.

    I am allowing it because it is a reflection of your thought process (which appears to be minimal) and most Bots that stop by here. If you want to respond to the topic of the post fine, which BTW is the hemorrhaging of our financial institutions. SO, you’ve been forewarned, next time, unless you have something of merit to say, I’ll use the delete button.

  8. Fortunateson

    Having been chastised by the blog meister and asked to be more on focus “..which BTW is the hemorrhaging of our financial institutions. (a valid point) allow me to elucidate my point more succinctly.
    I don’t’ totally agree with POTUS’ socialist view and did not vote for him. I have always voted libertarian. But the bleeding of our economy started long before he took office. Namely the TARP program promoted by W and Sec Paulson. Secondly the bailout (or incentive or whatever it is called) is a product of the 2008 congress and had wheels and a head of steam prior to the current election. Add to that the laissez-faire attitude of the lame duck Bush administration and here we are. Who ever took the oath of office in January would be in the same spot. So blaming Obama for our current financial situation is like blaming the thermometer for the temperature outside. It is a simplistic approach to a complex issue and that is why I called it “Sour Grapes

  9. sportsone234

    Fortunateson:

    Thanks for submitting something of substance.

    So let me address your points, which BTW, I mostly agree with. Yes, Obama inherited a bad situation, complicated by the Paulson bailout for his friends (as far as I’m concerned) and Bush’s overall laissez-faire attitude toward Wall Street’s ability to grow the economy with as little interference as possible.

    But inheriting a bad economy isn’t an excuse for for doubling the debt. Obama had many, many options for showing great leadership and opted instead to use the “crisis” for the furtherance of goals more expansive than the economy. He allowed Princess Pelosi tko ride rough shod on the $787 billion bill rushed through the Congress. And, today we got another pork filled bill that he signed despite his promise to stop the earmark abuses. Surprise . . . another campaign promise broken.

    It is as tiresome and tedious to hear Obama whine about Bush and the economy he inherited as it was to listen to Bush whine about Clinton’s economy. BTW, I am a long time democrat unable to affiliate myself with that current group of hypocrites in Congress and in the White House. I am (now) fiercely independent and proud of it . . . fed up with both parties, but more so with the Democrats who have turned out to be worse than the Bushies!

  10. Fortunateson

    You are correct on both blame accounts. Bush blamed all the WMD stuff on Clinton’s bad intelligence. My retort would be, okay your the president fix it and stop complaining. Same goes for Obama. Don’t tell me what you can’t do, you were elected to change things, so change them. And yes he (as have all presidents) broke his no earmark position before the ink was dry on his inaugural documents. I don’t much care for Pelosi either. My idea of hell would be listening to her and Hilary debate. Their voices are like fingernails on a chalkboard. But it is time for Obama to either paint or get off the ladder

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s