I’m posting this without comment.
The following article appeared on Saturday April 19th in the Washington Times. (H/T to tpt/ny)
Key witness in passport fraud case fatally shot
Read the complete post here:
The quest for the truth shouldn’t be this difficult.
I stopped asking … long ago… why doesn’t Team Obama release all the documents related to establishing beyond a question of doubt that Barack meets all the requirements to the hold office of POTUS. In particular, that he is a natural born citizen as required in Article II Section 1.
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.
Well, the answer of course, is that Obama couldn’t release the documents during the campaign because they would prove his ineligibility. So Team Obama did the next best thing, they put a copy of a forged COLB or Certificate of Live Birth on their website, crossed their fingers, and hoped it would be enough.
Oh, and for good measure they admitted that Barack Hussein Obama held dual citizenship . . . his father (real father? not clear at all) was British.
The problem is neither the phony birth certificate or the admission of BHO’s dual citizenship did anything to quell the normal inquiries. Team Obama either hoped or assumed that the average voter had neither heard of the natural born citizen clause or would care . . . after all BHO was the one, right?
They were wrong, particularly when people like myself began asking straight questions that should have been easy to answer. The harder Team Obama balked at providing the documents the harder we pushed. I am reminded of Nixon’s downfall, and the downfall of many others who have met a similar fate . . . its always the cover-up!
Which leads up to today. It is being reported that a new and better forged set of documents is being prepared by Team Obama to show he was always eligible. (H/T to Oil for Immigration for bringing this to our attention)
This is from RepubX
Don’t know about 9/11 conspiracy, but do know from DC source that an Administration team is working on perfecting a forgery of the long-form birth certificate. They plan on presenting it in a a month or so. The source is FBI agent who has drinking buddy from University of Illinois now in the Administration. Its second hand, but the source is supposed to be solid.
They have already prepared the forgery with special paper and ink. The document was printed on a fully functional 1960 Heidelberger printing press located at a print museum in Toronto. Access was arranged by a trustee of the museum who is connected to a large Canadian banking/investment firm with major US interests.
If this story is true, here’s the problem with this tactic.
Why should anyone believe that Team Obama would suddenly want to show his long-form birth certificate? Are we supposed to believe that it isn’t another fake.
Oh, please, the government makes up phony documents for the witness protection programs all the time. Go ask someone in the antiquities market how many “really good” forgeries are out there.
If Obama had the documents that proved his eligibility, he’d have had them posted months ago and the speculation and lawsuits would be over. Anyone who doesn’t recognize that fact, should stop mainlining the Kool-Aid. He’s a phony . . . a fake.
The time passed long ago for openness and honesty . . . for . . . ahem . . . transparency. Unless, Team Obama opens up all of his records . . . all of them . . . for inspection . . . he will forever remain a phony, faux president; and history will record him as such! HISTORY WILL RECORD HIM AS SUCH!
BTW, your thoughts and input welcomed as we move through this new phase.
Apparently Caroline Kennedy’s support of Barack has come at a price.
My question is how tone deaf can Obama and Caroline both be? Obama supports partial birth abortion and it is now being reported that Caroline supports abortion as well. Is anyone surprised that the Vatican nixed the appointment?
The Telegraph UK is reporting: read more here
There’s always someone lurking in the bushes, as it were, waiting to be “Oh ffended” … waiting to pounce!
We have sunk to a new low in sniveling Political Correctness. Yes boys ‘n girls our ubiquitous Chia pets cannot mingle one with the other because the new Obama Chia pet is racist! SAY WHAT? What lunatic hospital let these people out? Can you people get a life?
Walgreens has removed a Barack Obama version of the Chia Pet from its stores.
The Deerfield-headquartered drugstore chain made the move Friday after getting a few complaints about the item since the product”s April 1 launch, a spokeswoman said.
Chia founder Joseph Pedott — a Chicago native whose San Francisco-based Joseph Enterprises provides local jobs for the disabled — said he was inspired to create the Obama head as a show of patriotism
Maybe its just me, but I didn’t find the Obama Chia offensive. After all haven’t most of us received one of these little critters at least once in out lives? Usually you could tell it was from someone who decided to go to a drugstore for a last minute gift (under $10 bucks) and saw the Chia displays at the checkout counter.
Personally in my humble opinion, if the manufacturers had come out with one of those wall mounted singing fishes, put an afro on it, and called it an Obama Singing Bass . . . that might have been what? Funny, perhaps?
At least the White House didn’t put out a press release condemning the the newest addition to American kitsch. AND blessedly, Joe Biden did not regale us with his story about how Chia Pet people came to him with an idea for a Biden Buffoon Chia and he said, “look behind you Mr. President no one is following.” Opps, looks like Joe got his stories mixed up, again.
Thanks to Racquel who inserted this picture of a racist mailbox in her comment at Sodahead.
For more funny pictures go to here and visit.
How does one defend the indefensible . . . oh, say like warrentless wiretapping? Attack the messenger and forget the message, that’s how.
John, Obama Sheeple, doesn’t like my use of the word “faux” when describing President Obama. I used it in yesterday’s post . . . OLBERMANN CRITICIZES FAUX PRESIDENT OBAMA – HELL FREEZES OVER!!!
Guess that’s a bigger issue for him than the fact that the Obama “Justice” Department is intent on taking a position on wiretapping that is more radical than Bush 43’s position! If you liked Bush 43’s position on this, you’ll love Obama’s stance.
I have rules for posting a comments here; rules that include attack the problem/issue being discussed not the writer or administrator of this blog. Apparently John didn’t read those rules. I have intentionally left his comment up this morning because nothing could be a clearer demonstration of the Obama lock-step mindset that plagues us.
That’s why it is a topic worthy of a post. Here’s John’s response to the Obama ‘s decision to break another campaign promise to fight to restore civil liberties and privacy:
“Faux President”? Obama wasn’t elected president by an overwhelming majority of American voters?
Using the word ‘Faux’ (as in ‘Faux News’ to mock Fox News, where you mindlessly picked this up), means that “it is NOT in reality”. Being elected president by the overwhelming majority of American voters makes you the actual president (unlike Bush who lost in 2000, and unlike Hillary who lost in the primaries).
Reality’s apparently something you despise. And your being a sexist twit only makes your situation more pathetic and “faux reality”.
So says, John, Obama Sheeple. Hmmm, I’m a sexist (that’s a new one… must have gotten tired of using the racist card) living in faux reality where Obama was elected by the “overwhelming” majority of voters.
John, Obama has trashed the Constitution. He is a faux president until such time as he produced the documents that prove once and for all that he is a natural born citizen, eligile to hold the office of president, as required by the Constitution. You remember the Constitution, don’t you?
BTW, you’d make a good storm trooper for Obama Truth Squads. You remember those, don’t you? Obama used them to defeat Hillary “fair & square” …. not! Governor Matt Blunt said of Truth Squads:
“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system (surprise, surprise, surprise, she said) and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.
“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights.
John, “snap out it!”
Yes, it happened this evening . . . Keith Olbermann, Obama lapdog & apologist extraordinaire, criticized Obama and his “Justice” Department. Seems his administration has taken steps that are more extreme than Bush 43 ‘s position on wiretapping and a citizen’s right to sue the government.
We all remember how outraged the left and the MSM media were about Bush’s tactics and the wide scale intrusion into our right for privacy? This evening in the irony of ironies it was Olbermann bringing this issue to the forefront. For the first 10 minutes of his program he was the Keith of old … performing like an actual journalist. Alas, that didn’t last very long . . . one segment that’s all!
To the point:
The Obama administration is defending, yet again, the wide ranging illegal wire tapping program of the Bush administration despite fiercely criticizing this policy during the Presidential campaign. His Justice Department is advancing the usual circular logic argument of “national security” in defending the government against a suit brought on behalf of AT&T customers who suspect that their communications were illegally intercepted by federal authorities.
Read the rest of this post here: