OBAMA’S PASSPORT RECORDS & A DEAD CONTRACT WORKER

I’m posting this without comment.

The following article appeared on Saturday April 19th in the Washington Times. (H/T to tpt/ny)

Key witness in passport fraud case fatally shot

Read the complete post here:

OBAMA’S TEAM TO PRESENT A NEW SET OF FORGED DOCS PROVING HE’S NOT A FAKE

The quest for the truth shouldn’t be this difficult.

I stopped asking … long ago… why doesn’t Team Obama release all the documents related to establishing beyond a question of doubt that Barack meets all the requirements to the hold office of POTUS.  In particular, that he is a natural born citizen as required in Article II Section 1.

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.

Well, the answer of course, is that Obama couldn’t release the documents during the campaign because they would prove his ineligibility. So Team Obama did the next best thing, they put a copy of a forged COLB or Certificate of Live Birth on their website, crossed their fingers, and hoped it would be enough.

Oh, and for good measure they admitted that Barack Hussein Obama  held dual citizenship . . . his father (real father? not clear at all) was British.

The problem is neither the phony birth certificate or the admission of BHO’s dual citizenship did anything to quell the normal inquiries.   Team Obama either hoped or assumed that  the average voter had neither heard of the natural born citizen clause or would care . . .  after all BHO was the one, right?

They were wrong, particularly when people like myself began asking straight questions that should have been easy to answer.  The harder Team Obama balked at providing the documents the harder we pushed.  I am reminded of Nixon’s downfall, and the downfall of many others who have met a similar fate . . . its always the cover-up!

Which leads up to today.  It is being reported that a new and better forged set of documents is being prepared by Team Obama to show he was always eligible. (H/T to Oil for Immigration for bringing this to our attention)

This is from RepubX

Don’t know about 9/11 conspiracy, but do know from DC source that an Administration team is working on perfecting a forgery of the long-form birth certificate. They plan on presenting it in a a month or so. The source is FBI agent who has drinking buddy from University of Illinois now in the Administration. Its second hand, but the source is supposed to be solid.

They have already prepared the forgery with special paper and ink. The document was printed on a fully functional 1960 Heidelberger printing press located at a print museum in Toronto. Access was arranged by a trustee of the museum who is connected to a large Canadian banking/investment firm with major US interests.

If this story is true, here’s the problem with this tactic.

Why should anyone believe that  Team Obama would suddenly want to show his long-form birth certificate?  Are we supposed to believe that it isn’t another fake.

Oh, please, the government makes up phony documents for the witness protection programs  all the time.  Go ask someone in the antiquities market how many “really good” forgeries are out there.

If Obama had the documents that proved his eligibility, he’d have had them posted months ago and the speculation and lawsuits would be over. Anyone who doesn’t recognize that fact, should stop mainlining the Kool-Aid.  He’s a phony . . . a fake.

The time passed long ago for openness and honesty  . . . for  . . . ahem . . . transparency.  Unless, Team Obama opens up all of his records . . . all of them  . . . for inspection . . . he will forever remain a phony, faux president; and history will record him as such! HISTORY WILL RECORD HIM AS SUCH!

VATICAN TO OBAMA – FORGET CAROLINE KENNEDY’S APPOINTMENT

Apparently Caroline Kennedy’s support of Barack has come at a price.

My question is how tone deaf can Obama and Caroline both be? Obama supports partial birth abortion and it is now being reported that Caroline supports abortion as well. Is anyone surprised that the Vatican nixed the appointment?

The Telegraph UK is reporting:  read more here

OBAMA CHIA PET IS RACIST!- SAY WHAT?

There’s always someone lurking in the bushes, as it were, waiting to be “Oh ffended”  … waiting to pounce!

We have sunk to a new low in sniveling Political Correctness.  Yes boys ‘n girls our ubiquitous Chia pets cannot mingle one with the other because the new Obama Chia pet is racist!  SAY WHAT? What lunatic hospital let these people out?  Can you people get a life?

Walgreens has removed a Barack Obama version of the Chia Pet from its stores.

The Deerfield-headquartered drugstore chain made the move Friday after getting a few complaints about the item since the product”s April 1 launch, a spokeswoman said.

Chia founder Joseph Pedott — a Chicago native whose San Francisco-based Joseph Enterprises provides local jobs for the disabled — said he was inspired to create the Obama head as a show of patriotism

Maybe its just me, but I didn’t find the Obama Chia offensive.  After all haven’t most of us received  one of these little critters at least once in out lives?  Usually you could tell it was from someone who decided to go to a drugstore for a last minute gift (under $10 bucks)  and saw the Chia displays at the checkout counter.

Personally in my humble opinion,  if the manufacturers had come out with one of those wall mounted singing fishes, put an afro on it, and called it an Obama Singing Bass . . . that might have been what?  Funny, perhaps?

At least the White House didn’t put out a press release condemning the the newest addition to American kitsch.  AND blessedly, Joe Biden did not regale us with  his story about how Chia Pet people came to him with an idea for a Biden Buffoon Chia and he said, “look behind you Mr. President no one is following.”  Opps,  looks like Joe got his stories mixed up, again.

Thanks to Racquel who inserted this picture of a racist mailbox in her comment at Sodahead.

For more funny pictures go to here and visit.

OBAMA SHEEPLE DEFENDS RADICAL WIRE TAPPING POSITION BY OBAMA THE “JUSTICE” DEPARTMENT

How does one defend the indefensible . . . oh, say like warrentless wiretapping?   Attack the messenger and forget the message, that’s how.

John, Obama Sheeple,  doesn’t like my use of the word “faux” when describing President Obama. I used it in yesterday’s post . . . OLBERMANN CRITICIZES FAUX PRESIDENT OBAMA – HELL FREEZES OVER!!!

Guess that’s a bigger issue for him than the fact that the Obama “Justice” Department is intent on taking a position on wiretapping that is more radical than Bush 43’s position! If you liked Bush 43’s position on this, you’ll love Obama’s stance.

I have rules for posting a comments here; rules that include attack the problem/issue being discussed not the writer or administrator of this blog.  Apparently John didn’t read those rules.  I have intentionally left his comment up this morning because nothing could be a clearer demonstration of the Obama lock-step mindset that plagues us.

That’s why it is a topic worthy of a post.  Here’s John’s response to the Obama ‘s decision to break another campaign promise to fight to restore civil liberties and privacy:

“Faux President”? Obama wasn’t elected president by an overwhelming majority of American voters?

Using the word ‘Faux’ (as in ‘Faux News’ to mock Fox News, where you mindlessly picked this up), means that “it is NOT in reality”. Being elected president by the overwhelming majority of American voters makes you the actual president (unlike Bush who lost in 2000, and unlike Hillary who lost in the primaries).

Reality’s apparently something you despise. And your being a sexist twit only makes your situation more pathetic and “faux reality”.

So says, John, Obama Sheeple.  Hmmm, I’m a sexist (that’s a new one… must have gotten tired of using the racist card) living in faux reality where Obama was elected by the “overwhelming” majority of voters.

John, Obama has trashed the Constitution.  He is a faux president until such time as he produced the documents that prove once and for all that he is a natural born citizen,  eligile to hold the office of president, as required by the Constitution.   You remember the Constitution, don’t you?

BTW, you’d make a good storm trooper for Obama Truth Squads.    You remember those, don’t you? Obama used them to defeat Hillary “fair & square” …. not!  Governor Matt Blunt said of Truth Squads:

“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system (surprise, surprise, surprise, she said) and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.

“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s   thinking than using the power   of  the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights.

John, “snap out it!”

OBAMA, GEITHNER, & CONGRESS – THE DECEIVERS CONTINUE THEIR ASSULT ON THE CONSTITUTION

Revelation 13:17 … and that no one may buy or sell except one that has the mark, or the name of the beast, for it is the number of a man.  His number is 666

Well, before anyone wants to jump ugly . . .

let me say up front I wasn’t looking for this quote.  I happened to hear it today while I was channel surfing.I usually don’t quote Bible verses, but this one resonated today given the fact that (Hail Caesar) Geithner wants even more control over our financial institutions and the economy.

Since I’ve quoted from the one above let me also quote from my favorite Bible verse, as well.

Micah 6:8 … What does the Lord require of you?  To love justice, to show mercy, and to walk humbly with Him.

Sometimes one needs to take a break, step back, and make assessments. After having taken a step out the Obama maelstrom for a few days, I wish could say I felt this country was heading in the right direction. I can’t because it isn’t.

During mass yesterday, interspersed between the prayers and music for Palm Sunday, were thoughts of the fraud Obama and his hitman Tim “gimme more power’ Geithner.

Until such time as the evidence proves contrary, Obama remains the first man to fraudulently secure the office of  POTUS knowing from the beginning that he was always  ineligible.

His election to the highest office in the land remains a travesty.  I could almost find a way to make this abomination less disgusting if his policies were good for this country or if he was a good president; neither is true. The truth is his economic policies are tearing the country into pieces.

SO,  here we are with  Geithner seizing control of the nation’s banks through extortion (take the TARP money, or else!)  using fear and yelling “chaos, crisis, hurry…. hurry….NOW!” The faux President fires the head of General Motors, and the Congress tries to pass a retroactive law taxing bonuses of AIG executives at a 90% rate . . . and the MSM is talking about Michele’s short sleeve dresses!

I have but two questions:

1. Where in the Constitution does the faux President, or any president have the power or authority to fire an executive of any company (public or private)? SHOW ME THE ARTICLE OR PARAGRAPH THAT ENUMERATES THIS.
2. Where in the Constitution is it written that Tim Geithner has the power or authority to force the nation’s bankers to take the TARP money, or to determine how a bank will be run, or to refuse to allow a bank to re-pay the TARP funds? SHOW ME THE ARTICLE OR PARAGRAPH THAT ENUMERATES THIS.

Did you find it?  Didn’t think so!

TROLL! J’ACCUSE – FALSELY ACCUSED – PART II

OK, where was I? Oh ya, I had just been handed my head, figuratively speaking of course, by the site administrator over at Free Republic for a still undisclosed and unknown reason.

"Off with her head!", the Red Queen said.

What was really weird was I had just posted an update on Obama, martial law, and Blackwater. How could my “offense” have anything to do with that? Hmmm, not likely. Could it be my last post of a few days earlier, on my other blog, Say No to Plastic and entitled, Memo to Megyn Kelly – Using Plastic Bags is So Yesterday? If that was the reason, that would also be weird for two reasons.

One, I’ve posted on concerns about our thoughtless use of all forms of plastic before on Free Republic without suffering any consequences. While most did not agree with me, some did. I didn’t expect complete agreement. One knows in advance that people preaching about global warming, for example, are not welcomed there. I’ve tried to be respectful and mindful of that . . . never vilifying the plastic industry.

Besides we can’t all agree with each other all the time; Kool-Aid Kids and Obama bots do that . . . not adults. Aren’t Freepers and Puma’s against lock-step thought and absolute adherence to every point of view held by their leaders? I thought so.

Two, if the Megyn Kelly post was the offense, why take this action now? The post had already been up for days.

So what happened? I still don’t know. What I do know is this. This action by the administrator at Free Republic is emblematic, symptomatic of what has happened to Americans in our country. We just don’t listen to each other any more. Most of the time, we don’t have the courtesy to give the other side an opportunity to talk and present their side of an issue. Sad. We spend more time looking for bad guys than we spend on looking for good ideas. The former is a waste of time . . . the latter is productive.

That is too bad, because we are all diminished when, with “knee jerk reactions”, we close our ears and our minds to those holding opposing opinions. Holding onto strident positions without considering, even momentarily, that there is another legitimate point of view weakens us.

Let me give you two small examples of personal changes I have made.

For years I have been against drilling in ANWR and building new nuclear plants. While I remain a Hillary supporter, once it was clear Obama was going to be selected to run for POTUS by the Dems, I became a McCain/Palin supporter believing that putting country ahead of party was the only thing to do.

I thought Palin was a brilliant pick by McCain . . . still do . . . and if the Republican Party wants to resurrect itself, it needs more common sense people like Palin. Anyone think if Palin was Governor of California that the State would have the deficits that have been allowed to grow under Schwarzenegger? No, of course, not. Ah, but I digress.

When Sarah was campaigning I heard her discussions about ANWR. Who better to discuss the issue than the Governor of Alaska. Not surprisingly, her observations of the importance of ANWR and its environmental impact were markedly different from what is generally portrayed in the MSM.

I also listened to McCain discussing nuclear power and remembered living through Three Mile Island when I lived in Pennsylvania. I still remember radio station KYW’s updates. We were told that there was a real possibility that we were going to have to evacuate; the fear was thick, palpable. I remember asking myself, if there’s only a half hour to decide what to keep and what to leave behind (forever?) what my choices would be.

I listened to McCain’s point about accident free power on subs and throughout the country; not a single accident in 20 years. Even after having lived through the Three Mile Island fear, I changed my position. Times change, the economy changes, what is necessary to continue to foster growth and greatness changes. We need to look at ourselves and ask if we are holding on to positions that no longer make any sense.

Right now the State of California has the resources and ability to run budget surpluses and get out of debt. Want to know how? Start opening the off shore oil leases. Start pumping the oil. In a barely reported story, FOX detailed how California and the country could profit. Instead, lacking the political will to do what makes sense and is for the common good, the “Governator” would rather take money from the “stimulus” bill . . . would rather have tax payers from Georgia and across the country foot their largess!

So what’s the moral to this? Well, for starters, any site/blog administrator can choose to do what they want, but I would suggest there was a better way to handle this.

I’ve deleted a hand full of comments over the last year . . . maybe six or seven. I’ve also left repugnant comments when I felt the comments were a true reflection of the person making them. In one case I was called a Nazi ”C” word . . . no not that “C” word . . . Conservative . . . the four letter one that begins with “C” and rhymes with runt.

I have a page called “Deleted” that gives the posting guidelines here. The first guideline is not to attack me personally. Attack the problem or topic of the post. This blog is supposed to be place for intelligent discourse, after all.

Let me point out, yet again, that no group has a monopoly on common sense, good ideas, or ideas for moving this country forward. More than ever before, we need to be talking to each other and listening . . . listening . . . even if the topic being discussed is one we do not agree with.

BTW, I checked my emails again this morning. Still no response to query. Think I’ll ever here back?

{{Sound of crickets}} Bueller? Bueller? Hello . . . is anyone there?

TROLL! J’ACCUSE – FALSELY ACCUSED – PART I

A few days ago I posted this under the title Can One be PUMA and a Freeper at the Same Time. Yesterday I realized that what I am discussing is much larger than a site administrator suddenly revoking someone’s posting privileges without any notice and completely out of the blue or my bruised feelings about the unjust accusation. Hence the title change.

This is really about us. All of us . . . closing ourselves off into little groups, hurling accusations, like spit balls, at people and ideas we don’t agree with. As you read this. Ask yourself how many ideas you are really giving a fair voice to?

For months, the answer to that question has been yes, as it relates to me. That all ended two days ago, when my posting privileges at Free Republic (where Freepers come from if you don’t know) were suspended for being a troll. A troll! AN OBAMA TROLL? WHAT KIND OF TROLL?

Need I say that I was stunned? Anyone that continues to visit this site knows my positions on faux President Obama and his ineligibility of hold the office of POTUS, the new age phony Democrats, my support of Sarah Palin, and host of other topics that continue to plague this country. Taking about plagues, we can put Princess Pelosi, Haughty Reed, Piggy Schumer, and Barfy Frank in that class. Scratch the word “class” none of these people have any class . . . replace that with cabal.

For those who have never heard of Free Republic, it is a conservative site where “true believers” and Reagan Republicans come to blog and share information. Some have called it a rabid den full of conservative loonies, not me, but guess who? Before going any further, if anyone wants to jump ugly about either PUMA’s or Freepers, don’t. This is not meant to be disparaging of either group!

I, on the other hand, found it to be a place that welcomed me, a fierce moderate (something I share with Benjamin Franklin), a Hillary supporter, and a one time Democrat. Point of fact, they found me before I found them. I’d never heard of them and probably would have never sought this group out on my own. So how did the relationship happen?

When reviewing the blog stats for this site, I continued to see numerous hits from the Free Republic site. Hmmm . . . who were these people? Freepers were reading what I had to say on a daily basis. After visiting their site and with a little trepidation, I joined the group because I found I agreed with most (not all) of their positions. (Candidly, I’m always a little suspicious of people that claim to hold every position I hold. That’s not possible and anyone who claims to hold identical thoughts with you all the time is either lying to themselves or lying to you.)

Yes, I joined a group with the dreaded “C” word . . . no not that “C” word you fool . . . Conservatives. What I found were smart, savvy, to the point, and in your face people who dislike the direction our country has taken, as much as the PUMA’s do. Yes, I am a PUMA and proud of it.

So, what could be the problem since both groups that I associate with share a love of country, a belief that the Constitution is of paramount importance . . . that it is the life blood of this country and that our country’s continued greatness is dependent upon adherence to the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and the documents that form our most perfect Union.

The only thing I can figure out is I have second blog that has a very tiny following. It is called Say No to Plastic which I will get back to in a minute. It couldn’t have been my last post at Hillary and me, which focused on an update on Obama’s abilities to declare martial law. SO, I’m guessing this is the reason because I really don’t know. I immediately sent an email to the site administrator asking what I had done that caused the equivalent of my being guillotined in France. The response I received was:

{{Sound of crickets}} Bueller? Bueller? Hello . . . is anyone there?

Yup, no response from the administrator of a group that should represent respectful freedom of speech and thought . . . one would think anyway. Not a word …. Zippo, zero, zilch, nada.

Tomorrow, more in Part II.

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OUTRAGE OF THE DAY – SAVE A PENNY CHEAT OUR VETS

On what planet do the people in the Obama Administration live?

How (fill in the expletive of your choice) tone deaf can the Democrats and supporters of the Obama administration’s plan to ask once wounded veterans to pay for their treatments (through their private insurance carriers) be? How could anyone consider this for even a nanosecond? It is hard to contain my anger at the vile nature of this exceedingly thoughtless and vile move.

H/T to GINA COBB for the following:

What can possibly going through Obama’s mind?

I thought President Barack Obama wanted universal health care for everyone! Well, I guess there are exceptions. Some people have to pay for all of it, and I guess Obama thinks the wounded Vet should be the one. But haven’t they already paid enough?

The leader of the nation’s largest veterans organization says he is “deeply disappointed and concerned” after a meeting with President Obama today to discuss a proposal to force private insurance companies to pay for the treatment of military veterans who have suffered service-connected disabilities and injuries. The Obama administration recently revealed a plan to require private insurance carriers to reimburse the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in such cases.

“It became apparent during our discussion today that the President intends to move forward with this unreasonable plan,” said Commander David K. Rehbein of The American Legion. “He says he is looking to generate $540-million by this method, but refused to hear arguments about the moral and government-avowed obligations that would be compromised by it.”

The Commander, clearly angered as he emerged from the session said, “This reimbursement plan would be inconsistent with the mandate ‘ to care for him who shall have borne the battle’ given that the United States government sent members of the armed forces into harm’s way, and not private insurance companies. I say again that The American Legion does not and will not support any plan that seeks to bill a veteran for treatment of a service connected disability at the very agency that was created to treat the unique need of America’s veterans!”

The balance of this post can be read here.

Let’s see we’ve got money for Princess Pelosi to fly to Rome to visit the Pope and to have a private military plane at the ready, billion dollar bail outs for AIG, money for the White House staff to hold parties with $100 a pound meat flown in from Japan, money for silly ass projects like a high speed rail line between Disneyland in California and the city of Las Vegas, money for 9,000 earmarks, but no money for out vets!

THE OBAMAS STUNNING LACK OF SAVVY, SOPHISTICATION, & STATESMANSHIP – DISSING PM BROWN & THE BRITS

By now most people have either  read or heard about the Obamas’ shabby treatment of England’s  Prime Minister Brown, one of America’s resolute allies.  I promised myself that I would let this pass, but I can’t.  There are faux pas and then there are faux pas, and this one was a dozy . . . by the Obamas . . . the duo who wants us to think Jack and Jackie every time we see them!

Candidly, I am ashamed that the Mr. Obama, America’s faux President, behaved in such a low class and boorish manner. You better believe the Kennedys’ would never have behaved with such a stunning lack of sophistication. This is from Canada Free Press:

Obama, the man that would “fix” our (America’s) “bad image” with the rest of the world, has just dissed Churchill after only one month in office. […] the British government has been made nervous about the relationship between England and the U.S. because of the casual return (given to President Bush immediately after 9/11 as sign of solidarity between our countries) of their generously loaned Churchill bust.

It isn’t just the shabby thoughtless gifts that the Obamas exchanged with the Prime Minister and his wife, it is the obvious fact that Obama and his team were clueless & didn’t recognize that the stagecraft needed for a visit from the British Prime Minister required the same careful stagecraft and planning as was displayed  by Obama during his run up to the presidency.

British officials admit that the White House and US State Department staff was utterly bemused by complaints that the Prime Minister should have been granted full-blown press conference and a formal dinner, as has been customary. They concede that Obama aides seemed unfamiliar with the expectations that surround a major visit by a British prime minister.

(Say what?)

[…] the mood of the event was at times strained, as Mr. Brown handed over carefully selected gifts, including a pen holder made from the wood of a warship that helped stamp out the slave trade, a sister ship of the vessel from which timbers were taken to build Mr. Obama’s Oval Office desk.  Mr. Obama’s gift in return, a collection of Hollywood film DVDs that could have been bought from any high street store, looked like the kind of thing the White House might hand out to the visiting head of a minor African state.

My immediate thought, after hearing about the Hollywood collection of DVD’s (presented in a format that the British PM cannot play in England) was hey, “why not also give Prime Minister Brown and his wife coupons for Pizza Hut or Kentucky Fried Chicken?”  At least the coupons could be redeemed!  After all, what kid doesn’t like pizza?  Maybe the DVD collection can be used for a door stop.

Is it necessary to point out that:

“British Prime ministers are just not treated this way by American presidents.  They are personally greeted at the airport. They are treated to state dinners or overnights at Camp David. Their private meetings are always followed by a long joint press conference in which members of each nation’s press get to question both heads of state at length.”

Well, apparently it is necessary to point this out to the Obamas. Here’s something else, “he made Prime Minister Brown look foolish back home, something that will not be lost on other heads of state.”

Making a guest look foolish is simply unforgivable, particularly when the guest is a representative of one of America’s most steadfast allies.  One wants to scream, “Are you kidding me?  Obama, are you so lame, so dumb, so self-absorbed as to not get this basic point?”

Memo to the Obamas: visits by Heads of State and British Prime ministers are not to be taken casually. Visits of this nature demand that you, America’s representative, present the very best of our country.These visits can either cement relationships or destroy them.

These visits should be handled with grace and dignity (DVD’s don’t qualify as dignified) and you should be aware that they require statesmanship, staging, and clarity of purpose.

BTW, Barack, you know those little gauze covers placed on lemon halves that sometimes accompany meals? They are to be left on when squeezing the lemon. It is gauche to remove them and demonstrates a lack of breeding.

Also, I bet if Michelle takes the time to look, she can find a book on proper White House etiquette that you two can read, before you welcome guests to our White House, again!  I’m not sure, but I think Letitia Baldrige may still be available for advice.